Bradford and Clark MISLED Parliament and the people.
Posted by watchingcyfswatchnewzealand on May 7, 2007
As posted on CYFSWATCH NZ
Bradford and Clark MISLED Parliament and the people.
Friday, 04.05.2007, 10:51pm (GMT12)
Bradford and
Clark MISLED Parliament and the people.
by kiwi1960
On the “Breakfast” TV show this morning, the Police Association person said that the Police welcome this amendment from
Clark and Keys because it now gives the Police the option NOT to charge anyone. He went on to say that the zero tolerance policy to family violence would have meant that the Police would have been forced to make an arrest. Now, that will not happen. Did Bradford and Clark not say in the house that no parent would be charged/arrested/criminalised with the repeal of the S59 law? I am now calling for Bradford and Clark to say sorry to the people of
New Zealand for misleading them, and they should face the house privileges committee for having told lies in the house. Those MPs that also used the speed limit analogy should also be ashamed to have used it, yes, if you speed, you wont be arrested but as it turns out, you would have been. Being arrested for speeding (provided you’re not drunk) wont ever have happened, but being arrested for lightly smacking your child WOULD, given the zero tolerance for family violence. From day one,
Bradford has lied to the people, called it hysteria or that people didn’t understand her bill, well, the people did understand it.
Bradford should resign NOW and then apologise to the people.
Clark has always misled the people, from paintergate to this sorry episode, she has proven herself unfit to lead a nation. John Keys has deserted the 80% of the people that would have voted National at the next election if only to have this stupid law repealed, but now he is a party to it, who do these people turn to now? Shame on him. On Closeup last night, Simon Barnet was the ONLY decent person being interviewed. He said it like it was, and the people respect that. What we got from the MPs was fluff and waffle. When Simon asked
Bradford if she would resign if one parent was arrested for lightly smacking a child, she just sat there with a stupid smirk on her stupid face.
Clark has to rescue her with waffle, no answer was given. This is another case of MPs not wanting to take responsibility for their own stupid laws.
Bradford must have known from day one that parents would, at the very least, been at very great risk of being arrested and/or facing a CYFS investigation. The fact that she lied from day one is proof that this person shouldn’t be elected… …Wait a minute, she WASN’T elected by the people. She is a list MP, meaning that the people voted for the party and the party elected her based on her list position. It used to be said that if you didn’t like the MP, you could vote them out, not anymore, not when we have MMP. So if list MPs are not elected by the people, but by the party, then they represent the party and not the people, makes sense right.Therefore, as they don’t represent the people, and are only there to make up the numbers, then they should be allowed to vote, but NOT introduce any bills into the house. If they cannot be elected outright, and get in on the “party” ticket, then they are second class MPs and shouldn’t have any rights to have laws passed, because if the voters did have any faith in Bradford, then they would have elected her. As she wasn’t elected because the voters had no faith in her, or didn’t trust her, then why should be that list MP pretend they have the people on their side and introduce a bill into the house? Bradford answers to no one (except her party) so she gets this stupid bill into the house and when 80% of the people are opposed to it, then she can ignore them because she doesn’t represent those people, only the party. What point is their in voting when stupid MPs get in by the party list? What point is there in voting for the other guy when the one you want out is in anyhow by the backdoor? MMP needs to be overhauled so we do not have to suffer the likes of
Bradford ever again, if they don’t fix the system, then don’t vote, or if you do vote, don’t vote for any party. In the meantime, Bradford and Clark have a
LOT of explaining to do and apologies to make. The only decent person worth voting for is Simon Barnet. Please phone his radio show and beg him to stand. If anyone can post details about how to get hold of him, I suggest we all email him our support if he decides to stand. SIMON FOR PM!
Watching CYFSWATCH NZ 
Jay said
Clark has been misleading the world for yrs
what is news to her, most of us knew it!
Do you know how hard it is to keep up with style? Back in the day, most would be content with a common home grown village idiot (without attachments and no fancy gizmos)
But no, Americia has gone one better,
they made one president.
We beat them to it, we made one Prime Minister. Both are near identical.
both have big mouths and
think they have even bigger…..
Both boring, neither seem to have a delete button or be able to bugger off to annoy
some other planet.
Peaka said
SEEMS LIKE YOU HAVE A BIG MOUTH TOO. NOTICE THAT YOU ALWAYS HAVE NOTHING ABOUT SOMETHING TO TALK ABOUT. ALWAYS BITCHIN ABOUT SOMEONE ELSE. I WISH I KNEW WHO YOU WERE SO I COULD TELL YOU TO BUGGA OFF AND ANNOY SOME OTHER PLANET. DAMN, YOU RUIN A GOOD ARTICLE WITH YOUR COMMENT….PLEASE GO BORE SOMEONE ELSE TO DEATH…..PLEASE
maus said
Satire is good for the soul.
If you do not like it, don’t read it
The PM is a two-faced person.
As to Bush, “who?”
Before labour got into power, they promised to sort out cyfs. Has this happened? NO!
What rights do parents have? none.
I feel the person called Peaka,must be a parrot, as they liked the first comment so much, their comment was near a mirror image. Got up grumpy did we?