In support of CYFSWATCH NZ and the right of Free Speech. First visit to Watching CYFSWATCH NZ? Visit our home page. Please visit our e/group at

Bill assumes all parents ‘beat’ their children

Posted by watchingcyfswatchnewzealand on April 27, 2007

Source: Scoop

Bill assumes all parents ‘beat’ their children


Mass gathering at Parliament Grounds
Wednesday 2nd May at 12.30pm  

25 April 2007

Anti smacking bill assumes all parents ‘beat’ their children

Organisers of next week’s mass gathering at Parliament Grounds to oppose the anti-smacking Bill are disappointed that John Key has not been able to negotiate a positive outcome with the Bill’s author, Green MP Sue Bradford, but are not surprised.

“Supporters of the Bill are working from the basis that they believe all New Zealand parents are child beaters. The message Government is sending to parents is that they simply cannot be trusted to raise their own children and the State can do a better job. Well we think the vast majority of kiwi parents will disagree,” say the organisers.

Repealing section 59 of the Crimes Act will expose parents to criminal prosecution should they lightly smack their children in circumstances normally deemed reasonable and appropriate. The Bills supporters argue that police will not prosecute in such cases, which raises a fundamental question – why introduce a law they have no intention of enforcing?

“The police and CYF’s will be duty bound to investigate such matters, regardless of whether a prosecution eventuates or not. And it is the judicial system that determines guilt, not the police. So this Bill by its very nature will put all New Zealand parents at the mercy of the State, which is a very scary prospect,” add the organisers.

To that end, a mass gathering at Parliament Grounds is being organised for Wednesday 2nd May at 12.30pm to oppose the anti-smacking bill. Speakers include Bishop Brian Tamaki, Pastor Peter Mortlock, Wellington Reverend Mike Weitenburg and former All Black and Wellington Hurricanes Captain Bull Allen.

Event details can be viewed on  


web metrics


2 Responses to “Bill assumes all parents ‘beat’ their children”

  1. Jay said

    Assuming? yeah, cyfs use similar terms,
    like: Could be , may be… Same culture
    of belittling parents and caregivers.

  2. ParentsAgainstAbuse said

    I’ve never beaten any of my children or grandchildren. Don’t believe in it, but a harmless smack is different, it can sometimes get through to a small child. But not to an older child.

    Jay, Have you smacked or beaten a child before? Or have you seen it happened to a child? I have seen other people do it, not nice, quite sickening. It ain’t right. Those children need to be protected… wouldn’t you agree? Or do you think it is our right as parents/guardians to punish the children as we like or as our mood permits? Cause if that’s the case, next time an adult rubs me the wrong way or insults me, maybe I should just beat the H##l out of them? Kids have rights, but parents should have a small leeway to exercise a “Smack” if it is beneficial and doesn’t leave marks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: