Watching CYFSWATCH NZ

In support of CYFSWATCH NZ and the right of Free Speech. First visit to Watching CYFSWATCH NZ? Visit our home page. Please visit our e/group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/watchingcyfs/

Labour stands by Bradford Bill.

Posted by watchingcyfswatchnewzealand on April 19, 2007

As posted on CYFSWATCH NZ

Labour stands by Bradford Bill.
Wednesday, 18.04.2007, 07:48pm (GMT12)

Labour stands by Bradford bill

Horsewhip-accused on new charges
Bill protesters make views clear
Cullen denies backing down on bill
Anti-smacking fight heats up
Govt may adopt anti-smacking bill
Govt withdraws anti-smacking urgency

Labour remains convinced Sue Bradford’s anti-smacking bill aimed at preventing violence against children is the best option on the table.

 

It along with the Greens has been challenged by National Leader John Key to a round table discussion to find a solution to the contention over the repeal of section 59 of the Crimes Act.

 

Cabinet Minister David Benson-Pope describes National’s suggestion as confusing and vague but says it does appear John Key’s position now mirrors that of the government. He says it is time Key got off the fence, showed leadership and sent some real messages to New Zealanders about his party’s attitude to violence.

 

He says it is up to John Key to provide a better idea than that reached by the Select Committee which has worked on the Bradford bill. And he has taken the unusual step of commenting on a live criminal case to prove his point.

 

A Timaru woman, previously acquitted for using a horsewhip to discipline her son, is back before the courts again. Her case has been consistently cited by supporters of the Bradford bill. This time she and her husband are charged with assaulting her second eldest son.

 

Benson-Pope says the case highlights the connection between violence against young people and family violence.

 

For his part, the National leader is stopping short of saying his party would repeal the law if it wins the 2008 election. However he says they would pay close attention to a referendum if the bill’s opponents manage to muster the numbers for one.

 

But Key says it is difficult to commit to being completely bound by a referendum as they do not know what support partners might bring them into government, and what their views on the issue might be.

 

United Future has chimed in as well, describing the olive branch being offered by National as commonsense. Leader Peter Dunne says the move might just provide a way through what has become a bitter and polarised debate.

 

He says he would be keen to be involved in the process but believes it should be restricted to political parties only, with no involvement from lobby groups.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: