Watching CYFSWATCH NZ

In support of CYFSWATCH NZ and the right of Free Speech. First visit to Watching CYFSWATCH NZ? Visit our home page. Please visit our e/group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/watchingcyfs/

Christian Love, Kinky Sex?

Posted by watchingcyfswatchnewzealand on April 19, 2007

Source: Reformation Testimony

Christian Love interpreted as Kinky Sex


Sue Bradford’s extraordinary slander of good Christian men and women who love their children enough to discipline them

Garnet Milne

All MPs must now sit up and take notice of the mindset of the socialist neo-pagan Mrs Sue Bradford, the ubiquitous promoter of the criminalization of parents who smack their children. Is she just getting desperate as the vote for her anti-family, anti-smacking bill approaches, or does she really believe that parents who want to discipline their children according to biblical principles are really sadomasochists in disguise?  I think the answer must be all of the above. In a lecture given to MAP – the Movement for Alternatives to Prison – on Thursday the fifth of October in Auckland, Sue Bradford asserted the most extraordinary claim I have heard coming from a neo-pagan in a long time. This is what she said:

Before I leave the psychological aspect of this debate, there is one other matter that I think underpins some of what is going on here. It has been hard to talk about in Select Committee, and in public, because of its very nature, although a few submitters have raised it. This is the question of the connection between sexual perversion and the beating of children and young people. Very few of us want to acknowledge it up front, but in fact the more I’ve been immersed in this issue, and the more I’ve heard groups predominantly made up of men proclaiming and lauding the right of adults to beat children, and in some cases talking or writing about the right methods of administering the rod and so on, the closer the unspoken connection gets. This is accentuated by literature put out by groups like Carey College and Tyndale Park Christian Schools in Auckland, and by Family Integrity’s little booklet on corporal correction, which I’ll talk about a bit more shortly. Personally, I have no problem with sadomasochism carried out between consenting adults using safe sex practices – what I do have a problem with is a legacy of hidden sexual violence practised on children and young people under a mantle of so-called discipline. I have also heard comments and stories from victims who have directly experienced the connection, but whose words will never be heard in public because of the nature of the offence against them. Section 59 of the Crimes Act, has been protecting the perpetrators of a vicious mix of sexual and physical abuse for generations, and I don’t want this forgotten. I just want it stopped.

Notice that she links “sexual perversion” and the literature produced by Carey College and Family Integrity. She produces absolutely no evidence and then claims that section 59 is allowing this sexual abuse to continue. She claims that “groups predominately made of up men proclaiming and lauding the right of adults to beat their children” and giving instructions how to use the rod “the closer the unspoken connection [between sex and corporal punishment] gets”. She goes on to give Carey College, a Christian school, and Family Integrity, a Christian lobby group, as examples of organisations who produce such literature. “This [sexual perversion she identifies as sadomasochism] is accentuated” by the literature put out by these two Christian organisations. To accentuate means to  “bring out distinctly; to make prominent; to emphasize”. Surely Bradford has overstepped the mark here and slandered godly people who are merely promoting traditional values. Bradford gives absolutely no proof of her malignant claim of a link between these groups and sadomasochism, or show one instance where such perversion has never been prosecuted successfully in a court because of section 59 of the Crimes Act.

Where would such a baseless lie come from? The Bible tells us that Satan is the father of lies. And surely this is a lie of satanic proportions: “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it” (John 8:44). MPs should be up in arms in the house over this diabolical libel against good Christian citizens, and  Bradford should be disciplined for bringing parliament into disrepute. Because these Christian groups are small and have no financial base, they will never be able to take Bradford to court for promoting such atrocious lies about the connection between kinky perverted sex and Christian parental love. The Scriptures say: “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! ( Isa 5:20)” 

The tyranny of neo-pagan totalitarianism must be stopped. Are there MPs of principle prepared to step up to the plate and repudiate this nonsense?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: