Watching CYFSWATCH NZ

In support of CYFSWATCH NZ and the right of Free Speech. First visit to Watching CYFSWATCH NZ? Visit our home page. Please visit our e/group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/watchingcyfs/

Video: TV3 Horsewhip story 13/4/07 and Timaru lady video and Youtube comments.

Posted by watchingcyfswatchnewzealand on April 14, 2007

As posted on CYFSWATCH NZ

Video: TV3 Horsewhip story 13/4/07 and Timaru lady video and Youtube comments.
Friday, 13.04.2007, 10:27pm (GMT12)

http://www.tv3.co.nz/default.aspx?tabid=112&articleID=25047#vidlist25047

Related Youtube video (See and hear from the Timaru lady whose test case initiated Sue Bradfords bill):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wD1Tvu206Nw

The Timaru Lady speaks out – herself

09:59

Added: 1 day ago
From: rynso
Views: 988

All Comments (46 total)

Post a new comment

robocopnz (1 day ago)

Good on u lady. Remember that most of NZ stand behind u, not the loopy lefty politically correct feminists running this country. They don’t really care about keeping children safe; hell, they permit the murder of 16,000 of them each year (one every 20 minutes). All they care about is power and state control of everything, including our families.

(Reply)

culpablefeline (4 hours ago)

While I agree the bill is awful and will do a lot more harm than good I can’t help but think you suck as parents. Obviously I am basing that on your upcoming trial for belting another one of your kids…
Its a pity governments can’t just ban the grossly brainless from consuming valuable oxygen, it would immediately take care of yourself, the Kahuis and Sue Bradford in a fell swoop.

(Reply)

theboybiggles (1 day ago)

Very important video – fantastic.

(Reply)

notreallyanything (22 hours ago)

An extraordinarily difficult situation. I do not know what I would have done in her place, and it is not for me to judge

(Reply)

mikeybill (11 hours ago)

Having read about the latest episode of child abuse you and your new husband have indulged in, I hope they throw the book at the pair of you and tkae your kids off you.
You are an unfit mother, and the sooner CYFS remove the kids from your care the4 better off they will be.

(Reply)

rynso (11 hours ago)

When the full story about this latest situation comes out you will find it just as distorted in the media as the other one.

(Reply)

rynso (11 hours ago)

Unfortunately the story cannot be told at the moment because it is before the courts, but as soon as I am able to, I will tell it. She is not an unfit mother at all, rather one that has been unjustly treated by CFYS and the MSM. Even this latest story repeats the lie in the heading of the story, that it was a horse whip she used on her son. That should be enough for anyone to hold in suspicion the current reports.

(Reply)

rynso (9 hours ago)

Further…the current case is before the courts, the mother denies the charges and disputes the crown
evidence. It is not proper to comment prior to the full facts being revealed at trial.

(Reply)

brazengrrl (4 hours ago)

Bit of a bummer that there is an independent witness that saw *some* of it, isnt it? You are not seriously backing someone who punches, kicks and knees their child, are you? Bye bye credibility! Presumably this is a different son to the first case since the first son was protected by CYFS.

(Reply)

ThrottleStuckOpen (10 hours ago)

How to you account for punching your son in the face? Hog tying him with tape? Your husband admitting in court to assaulting the boy? You (or your husband) kicked the boy in the kidneys? I’m a parent and I beleive in my right to discipline my own kids, but smashing your kid in the face with a closed fist – wake up to yourself woman.

(Reply)

rynso (5 hours ago)

If you are relying on a DomPost or STUFF report, you are passing judgment on the basis of severe distortion. It would be wiser to suspend judgment till the full story is told in court. I think you may come to a different conclusion – or at least have some sympathy.

(Reply)

pebostoney (4 hours ago)

I hope they throw the book at you ,how about i beat you with a horse whip and see how you like it .you are indeed a demented bitch if you think that the things you have done are alright .

(Reply)

awakekiwi (9 hours ago)

she did beat, or more correctly his stepdad did BEAT him, from the court case:
Mr Hobbs told the court the boy’s arms were tied together. There was blood around his nose and mouth.
Mr Hobbs saw the man kick the boy two or three times and then grab him by the scruff of the neck, pulling him toward the vehicle, and put both his knees into the boy’s ribcage.
“He was putting everything into it,” he said. The woman did nothing to stop the assault.

(Reply)

rynso (5 hours ago)

See comment above.

(Reply)

rosieh2006 (8 hours ago)

Just listening to her droning on makes me want to do something disobedient. How soon can you leave home?

(Reply)

rynso (5 hours ago)

You sound somewhat jaundiced. See comments above.

(Reply)

mikeybill (6 hours ago)

runso – you expect her to admit what she’s done?

Any parent who draws blood in ‘disciplining’ their child is an unfit parent. And even is it was his step-father, she seems to have approved of it all.Ghastly people.

I hope someone who loves him gets to look after this kid – obviously his mother and step-father don’t.

(Reply)

Li2k7 (4 hours ago)

Just saw this on the news

(Reply)

silvermonk (4 hours ago)

Cane and riding crop. Thats REALLY showing the love Timaru Lady! *shakes head*

(Reply)

karam22 (4 hours ago)

this woman has a problem and needs help…

(Reply)

KingSatyr (4 hours ago)

fuck you, you child beater.

(Reply)

koston00 (4 hours ago)

Put the pipe away lady!!

(Reply)

topesakl (4 hours ago)

Well Done lady. Pity your boy is as angry as he appears to be. My father use to (and 36 years would be more than capable of) give me a hiding when I did things wrong and I would administer the same punishment if my children did the same.

(Reply)

luciremagazine (4 hours ago)

The matter is sub jure but if it were not for that, I respect the woman’s right to speak out.

(Reply)

Caerai (3 hours ago)

It’s funny how people let their morals, ideals and personal feelings get in the way of the issue…

The issue is all you good parents are going to have your babies taken away from you. Why? Well simply because there’s no way to prove you didn’t beat your child. Your going to ground your child, the child is going to point the finger, and forever you’ve got a black mark on your name and no babies.

(Reply)

Caerai (3 hours ago)

Of course this is what many parents what, afterall Kids aren’t intelligent enough to abuse a law change right?Wrong, every single parent on the face of the earth knows that if you give kids a way to control their parents, do what they want, they’ll do it, they’re kids, they’re not going to car that by doing it they get mommy and daddy taken away, they havn’t thought that far.

(Reply)

Caerai (3 hours ago)

This bill is going to rip entire families apart, it’s going to create record high numebrs of children in foster homes, and of course, the foster homes -will- be a dangerous place for children, and probably even shut down after ‘troubled’ children work out that they can accuse the foster homes through this bill and escape.

Really this bill gives power to people who don’t see far enough, and who will abuse it.
WAKE UP NEW ZEALAND AND LOOK AT THE ISSUES.

(Reply)

Timaruscum (3 hours ago)

YOU ARE SCUM LADY!!! I am so glad that you have been exposed and I hope they prove in a court of law that you are a despicable child abuser – GUILTY! Karma!

(Reply)

natiospa (3 hours ago)

What a load of crap. There is no way that a “Radical change of behaviour” in negative discipline can happen in a young boy.

I don’t agree with the Anti smacking law at all. There is little you say about the positive actions (the star chart is good). But for him to laugh at it obviously didn’t work because the rewards where stupid.

TV 3 news said this was removed and yet its still here. This a joke.

What you say about

(Reply)

TageKaliandrino (3 hours ago)

What amazes me is that the law change is intended to avoid the brutal beating and murder of children in New Zealand…PROBLEM? All laws are only abided by, by law abiding people. This section 59 banishment will not stop children being brutally beaten and murdered. I think it should be a parent’s right to discipline their children within reason, I mean, when kids run amok, who is held responsible? That’s right, the parents! Way to go, Sue Bradford bandwagon rider!

(Reply)

JadedAlien (3 hours ago)

I am against the anti-smacking law in it’s current form, but absolutely believe that the law does need revised, to protect children from people like you and your husband who grossly abuse the ‘reasonable force’ argument to justify your tyrannical and abusive parenting.

Your children are just that; children. If they’re angry, we need not look any further than the way they’ve been treated by those that are supposed to protect them. What kind of legacy are you leaving?

(Reply)


web metrics

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: